Dear Note: The Predicted Oomine Prediction
In the past week, Craig Emmerich has provided us with a major boost on the oxidative priorities of various fuel sources, such as fats, carbohydrates, and protein.
If you have not had the chance to read the Craig station, do it right. The brokers can really carry the home the most important oil. Images are requesting me. They have a system that covers you, and there is power to get you back when you make daily choices.
Today, I'm going to answer some of the questions you've raised against the comments board.
I actually respond to a series of questions from Gerard.
We've reviewed this before, and we all do it – can not we be sure of the same "carbohydrates"?
No, we are not. Craig has introduced a comprehensive image, 30,000 effective enough for most people who want to eat and measure their fuel, but there is a difference between different carbohydrates. I know he would tell a lot, maybe he has time to balance it here. If the timeline is accepted, we will add its final response today. But go back to the carbohydrates conflicts …. We will save the glucose fructose of the responses that we send to the following in Gerard. What about others?
Think about the motility. Fiber monolith is already different from carbohydrates more often than glucose and fructose that are unable to produce much (or even) high-energy energy. But you can continue to look at metaphorical texts for different types of fiber.
Fertilizers such as inorganic and acid-resistant fats are cut into white fats like bassirate and propionate. These provide an important signal of the cells and they are able to measure about 2 calories per gram, give or take. Other types of fiber are not cut and offer a lot of fat but not calorie.
Some carbohydrates are treated differently from different people. Fertilization lactose permits people to produce and use fats. Lactose intolerance prevents people from getting metabolism, making it stopping bacterial infections to develop and cause metabolic disorders. FODMAP tolerance is the same. Those who have FODMAP sweets such as sugar, lactose, and other in the mucous membranes, produce gas but can not calibrate; These do not contain drainage, generating energy.
Does fructose and glucose differ differently?
There are real conflicts. In one case, glucose raises insulin production, while fructose does not. But The difference can be as unpleasant as we usually think.
When scientists rely on isotopes to fructose, healthy diets eat, and then track metabolism, obtained:
- 50% was completed as glucose, converted to the liver to be used in other parts of the body.
- 25% was finished as lactate, replaced by the liver.
- 17% finished as glycogen in the liver.
- 2-3% was replaced by liver fats using de novo lipogenesis.
- The remaining duration was removed, removed from CO2.
According to research authors, this is similar to the metabolism of the metabolism of the glucose. Even if you're talking about de novo lipogenesis, it is often considered the only excess fructose region, research has shown that glucose excess also protects against the creation of new fatty acids.
As far as burning / oxidizing of glucose and fructose, there is a difference. Relaxation, people appear to burn fructose faster than the glucose. During exercise, people are swollen glucose faster than fructose. However, When you give fructose and glucose to others, they burn only faster than fuel sources. In one study, the ingredients were given 100 grams of fructose, glucose, or fructose + glucose. The fructose group ranging from 43.8% of their rats, the glucose group burned up to 48.1% of them, while fruktous + glucose burned up to 73.6% of their dose.
Is energy saving energy versus glucose (etc., liver and glycogen muscles)?
There is something wrong about fructose and glycogen. Here's the story you heard: Fructose can be useful for glycogen liver, while glucose only adds to the glycogen muscle.
It is not correct. I think for a while, as long as I've actually checked. It turns out that Fructose and glucose are able to help both liver and glycogen muscles. Fructose is about half the size of sugar like glycogen in the muscle, first as it should be converted to the liver before it is sent, but eventually it will get the job done.
One of the major differences is that there is a lot of room in your muscles in your liver. An average person can store about 300 grams of glycoge in their muscles, but only 90 grams of liver. Even if the metabolism of the metabolism is ultimately similar to the same, the real world is found in the glycogen room of the liver, and, therefore, the small fructose in the diet should not be removed from the borders and the metabolism of the metabolism problem.
Therefore, if you are talking about a heavyweight, someone who is surrounded by stuffed glycogen stores full of nutritious food, fructose will do different behaviors differently. Healthy diet, milk, fat, and activity, fructose based on whole foods is not a great deal that may not have a strong effect on glucose.
In each case, talk to the crescenders of the boat and gloves is unlikely to be an important part of the real world results. You can eat fruit, by condemning the cola. Enjoy sweet potatoes, not a Skittles bag in the pool. You will eat both glucose and fructose both at meals. Do not even get rid of nicely damaged nutrition – unless you have a low sugar level if you do not use it this way.
To what extent is called metabolised fructose in a way similar to alcohol more than carbohydrate?
Fructose is diagnosed by the liver. Alcohol is diagnosed by the liver.
Fructose takes liver without insulin. Alcohol is found in the liver without elevating insulin.
But later, according to Richard Feinman, the same is stopped. Alcohol is a toxic substance called poison. There may be some advantage & # 39; interest rates for low alcohol wine, but it is still toxic. Fructose can be a toxic condition, such as a well-known man with glycogen liver and full diabetes, but we are physically able to pay a normal amount without having a metabolism. Feinman sees many of the more listening tools than the actual word.
That is today, they are people. Thanks for reading and if you have more questions about the subject, tell me below and we will do the best to get them.
Tappy L, Lê KA. The effects of metabolism in fructose and increase in the world. Physiol Rev. 2010; 90 (1): 23-46.
Sun SZ, Empie MW. Humorous metabolism in humans – isotopic radio studies are to tell us. Nutr Metab (London). 2012; 9 (1): 89.
Blom PC, Høstmark AT, Vaage O, Kardel KR, Fluid S. Effects of sugar-based dietary diversity of glycogen muscles. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987; 19 (5): 491-6.
McDevitt RM, Bott SJ, Harding M, Coward WA, Bluck LJ, Prentice AM. De novo lipogenesis during a controlled substance with sukrose or glucose for both green and females. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 74 (6): 737-46.
Rosset R, Lecoultre V, Egli L, et al. Postexercise is full of muscle stores in combination with fructose or glucose. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017; 105 (3): 609-617.
If you would like to include a picture of all of your comments here!